Coming to the clinic, even with the common cold, we sometimes hear: "To clarify the diagnosis will send you an X-ray." And we are going to "show through" or take a shot that the doctor was able to accurately determine the nature of the disease. But X-rays, these rays are amazing, open the German physicist Roentgen more than a hundred years ago, helping not only in the diagnosis of disease - they also possess healing properties. They can be used to treat both cancerous and non-tumoral diseases. On the last treatment, and today we are going.
In the treatment of benign diseases using X-rays with a shallow brand name viagra absorption of radiation by tissues and in small doses. Usually, the X-ray resort when other means have been ineffective or when she has a notorious advantages over them, to the advantage of the method include its simplicity, the possibility of both outpatient and inpatient, painless procedure. For the treatment of patients with direct medical specialist (surgeon, neurologist, dermatologist, etc.), and the question of the value of radiation dose, frequency of sessions and the volume of irradiated tissue is within the competence of the doctor-radiologist.
Currently, radiotherapy has been used successfully in surgery, neurology, otolaryngology, dermatology, ophthalmology and other fields of medicine. Positive clinical effect was observed in 85-98% of cases.
In surgical practice
radiotherapy is used mainly in acute and chronic suppurative-inflammatory diseases, such as boils, carbuncles, erysipelas, panaritiums, osteomyelitis, postoperative complications and consequences of diabetes - the effectiveness of the method here is 90-97%. The most powerful X-ray in the initial stages of the inflammatory process: sometimes only 1-2 sessions is enough to suspend its development. And in case of complications of diabetes, accompanied by trophic changes in the tissues of the feet, radiotherapy often avoids surgery.
The largest share in X-ray non-neoplastic diseases accounted for the disease osteo-articular apparatus of degenerative-dystrophic nature - deforming arthrosis, scapulohumeral periarthritis, spondylitis osteochondrosis, heel and elbow bursitis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc. By providing anti-inflammatory effect on the surrounding soft tissue of joints, X-ray rays contribute to the reduction and disappearance of pain, increase range of motion in the joints or spine. 80% of patients noted a subjective improvement in health status already during the treatment. In addition, it is possible to dramatically reduce the dose of painkillers and anti-inflammatory pharmaceutical preparations, prolonged use which are often indifferent to the organism.
X-ray radiation is widely used in the treatment of diseases of the peripheral nervous system - neuritis, neuralgia, radiculitis, plexitis zoster and many others. Typically, they cause considerable suffering to people and lead to prolonged disability. For these illnesses is irradiated locally affected nerve roots, plexus or peripheral nerve trunks. Analgesic effect of radiotherapy in this case is associated with both suppression of inflammation Lucky in the nerve and surrounding tissues and with the reduction of pathological impulses.
In dermatology using X-ray treat chronic eczema, neurodermatitis, pruritis, keloid scars, hemangiomas, and others in chronic dermatoses, it has anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect, reduces the body's sensitivity to allergens, the recovery of a metabolism in the epidermal cells, the normalization of power in the tissues, stimulates skin regeneration. In the initial stage of irradiation of keloid scars can get rid of the pain and itching, helps stop the growth of keloid formation and leads to regression growths.
Accumulated over recent years positive experience of the leading clinics of the world confirms the feasibility and efficiency of X-ray non-neoplastic diseases. As shown radiobiological studies, small doses of X-rays had no harmful effects on the human body. A long-term results of X-ray analysis in our country and abroad has so far revealed no complications or adverse effects of its use.
More
As often happens in science, the discovery of rays that the whole world now calls the X-ray, was an accident. The autumn of 1895 an unknown professor at the University of Wurzburg Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen experimented with a Crookes tube glass bulb from which air is pumped out, and from opposite sides of the soldered metal electrodes. If you bring them current, a discharge occurs, making the space inside the tube and its walls begin to glow.
On that day, Roentgen was working with the instrument by wrapping it with black cardboard. After graduating from the experience, he turned off the lights and was about to leave the lab, when I noticed that on a sheet of paper coated with phosphorescent compound, comes a faint glimmer. But this is only possible in the light! And here Roentgen discovered that forgot to turn off the tube of Crookes. Hence, this is it emits rays, for which the black cardboard is not a hindrance? Forgetting about the time rengen continued to experiment. He established a screen in front of the tube and discovered that the mysterious rays can freely penetrate through most objects, like light through glass. But when a stream of these rays accidentally hit the hand researcher, he saw a glowing canvas of bone own fingers ... On the fourth day after the official announcement of Roentgen's discovery of an American doctor has used this property of the rays to determine the bullet lodged in his body or the patient's wound was through.
Children's Skin Care Problems and Solutions
Live on higher floors
Mittwoch, 29. Dezember 2010
Montag, 27. Dezember 2010
Food
Problems related to nutrition, a lot. These problems is not easy, but finding the right solution is very difficult - too large number of professionals who know exactly how one must eat.
Very difficult to be adviser in matters of marriage - the personal human experience is usually limited to one or two attempts. A little easier to solve sexual problems - that of a normal adult a little more experience - at least once in 10 days everyone is trying their knowledge in this matter, if not expanded, then at least make sure that there is life in the old dog yet ... But if we are talking about food - there can be three times each day holds over his body experiments. And because the experience is large, as they do not share - that spawn numerous treatises on the rules of supply, the compatibility of products, how to give the enemies of dinner, the benefits of raw food diet, the saving of fasting and so on and so n.
Numerous "theory of food - vegetarian, separate food and others - surprisingly reminiscent of religious tracts, in which angels, saints and sinners are replaced by proteins, fats, carbohydrates, slag and calories.
"He who believes in Mohammed, who is in God, who Jesus ..." and who in the enzyme, intestinal juice and the aforementioned proteins and carbohydrates - there's nothing you can do. Man - a being suggestible, and if you really convince myself that I must just so - it will always live and be happier.
It is crucial, however, another - any adult uncle and aunt are entitled to, based on their personal views and material resources, to solve - what, whom, when, together with what, instead of what and how much should be eaten. But the children! How to deal with them? The child's not to blame for the fact that his father decided to leisure master the rules of "nutrition", he (the child) can not feed itself - could chew and swallow, but to produce products in any way.
Hence an important conclusion - any experiments with food should brand name viagra be carried out on himself. Use their own children as guinea pigs - a cruel and unethical.
But those who support the Truth? Who knows - when, what, in what quantities? Probably no one. Nobody could be uniquely convinced he is right, but there is a definite reason to try to introduce some of the frames, narrow the range of the experiments, if not to teach the "correct", then tell - which certainly do not.
It is reasonable to try to find some criteria to answer questions about good and bad. Therefore, take some of the arguments. Thus, a man as a species there thousands of years. Over the millennia, he not only survived but became the "king of nature" - probably because it followed the laws of Nature. It is logical to assume the following: - if the power of the human species is accompanied by certain problems, these problems are natural for humans, and therefore there are natural mechanisms to solve these problems. We illustrate this situation with two simple examples.
1.
Have people go hungry? Of course, yes, for that matter, or any other biological species (hares, wolves, Carp, deer) from those that exist in the wild today. Output - fasting for a person naturally. You can talk about a sense of proportion, we can justify the rationality of the arguments about fasting get rid of toxins, but clearly there is a natural appropriateness.
2.
Vegetarianism. Ate or did not eat fish and meat our ancestors? From the standpoint of the author, is even eaten. And some people do not eat anything except fish and meat - for example, the Eskimos. Conclusion - vegetarianism, may be good, but from the perspective of Nature, it is not natural.
Becomes clear that if, for some reason a child will be left without food, the natural (evolutionary, physiological) mechanisms for adaptation will not give him an abyss. But the absence in the diet of animal protein will inevitably lead to impaired growth and development, as the above-mentioned mechanisms of adaptation to supply such an option does not exist.
Getting finally to the specific recommendations, we emphasize that in the vast subject should, firstly, divided into 3 main areas:
a) feeding young children;
b) nutrition and healthy children
a) The relationship nutrition and disease.
Secondly, we note that our task is not to provide answers to personal, tactical issues - how to cook oatmeal and how to feed a child sick with viral hepatitis. Our goal - a common strategy - the formulation of principles - which is not that good, bad, and that does not matter.
MEALS EARLY CHILDHOOD
The child should eat those foods that are most natural for him at the appropriate age.
And certainly no need to prove to anyone that there can be for a newborn child is nothing more valuable (natural) than breast milk. Not surprisingly, the infant-feeding mothers' milk and is called - naturally.
We note some fundamental aspects.
*
Time of the first latch to the breast. The first drops of milk - Colostrum - contain a substance, "triggering" the development of the immune system and normal digestion. Therefore, the sooner the child is applied to the chest, the better (best - right in rodzale). This fact is clearly proved by physiologists and physicians. Nevertheless, hundreds of maternity homes bring children to the first feeding on the second or third day, and even later. Motivated by a mother's fatigue, weakness of the child, the possibility of some congenital diseases in which the attachment to the breast can be dangerous and to refine the diagnosis takes time. In fact, the real reasons to not feed immediately after birth occur very rarely. Ways of solving problems - confidential conversation expectant parents with the doctor making the decision about the time of first feeding - a pediatric hospital (neonatologist). Always remember that do not feed immediately - a decision less risky and less responsible, and pay the doctor-neonatologist in no way encourage him to make responsible decisions.
*
If no or not enough milk? According to modern views that are optimally adapted to the use of infant formula. Choosing the latter is huge, and the dignity of obvious - ease of preparation, the presence of adequate amounts of vitamins, mineral salts and trace elements. Any dilution of cow's milk and is clearly inferior in all respects ready mixes. The only argument in favor - the price, although afterwards on medicines likely will take more money, so the savings is questionable.
*
The frequency of feedings and night break. A growing number of pediatricians has come finally to the conclusion that the most natural method of free-feeding. The essence of the latter - the child eats when hungry. From the physiological position, absolutely unnatural to wake the child to feed, and not to feed the hungry and screaming just because time has not come. The existence of biorhythms completely proved and from this point of view is obvious: the need for food can vary considerably not only in relation to time of day, but depending on weather conditions, time of day, the quality of breast milk and many other factors. Recommendations on the need to break in the night feeding - the best way to cause neurological disorders in parents and neighbors.
*
Lure - what and when? Interesting word "lure" requires explanation. Lure called the foods that the child receives the first year of life, in addition to breast milk or formula milk (not to be confused with the "supplementation"; supplementation - is when, for example, lacking a mother and baby finish feeding milk baby formula). The need for supplementary feeding is due to the assurances of scientists that at a certain stage of development of baby vitamins and other nutrients in breast milk does not provide the child's needs. Hence the conclusion - already a month old should give apple juice, and from 4 months - vegetable broth (or at least, that such instructions are in the medical "Handbook of Pediatric Dietetics). Studying these instructions, the author constantly feels the deepest doubts. Is unclear how contrive to date there other mammals? No, you can certainly assume that the mother-wolf consumes some unknown herb, to help the cubs back on its feet (or more precisely, on foot). Having read science fiction, you can even imagine how two-week cub daddy wolf-hunting brings valuable vitaminosoderzhaschie vegetables. But even with a maximum voltage of mental activity can not understand - where the "lack" vitamins white bear? What a clever way Nature punishes human children, where this inferiority complex? Why do all the other animals can live without the vegetable soups, and our children can not? But to admit that he was mistaken Creator (God or evolution, does not matter), the author can not.
The conclusion suggests itself - if the child does not have enough vitamins, you should either be properly fed by his mother, or give the baby milk formula, in that clever uncle and aunt have already included all the necessary vitamins. No one can ever really explain why a glass of apple juice, drunk nursing mother is worse than the drop of the same juice, swallowed month old baby.
But someday have to give something else. And when? To search for an answer once again sought the advice of Nature. In isolation from civilization baby is fed breast milk until the time when you can eat what his dad would bring from the hunt. And for eating will require teeth. Thus, the appearance of teeth is an important biological criterion, indicating the need for complementary feeding. And it becomes clear that all children are different - one lure will be needed in 6 months, and another - only 8. But no less clear something else: statements like "all of the month and all the juice from 5 months of soup" - at least, controversial.
Using a five-month age of fermented milk products, cheese, dairy, cereals (semolina, oats, rice, buckwheat) - is justified, but juices, broths, soups, egg yolks, vegetable and fruit puree to give the appearance of the teeth should not be.
It is obvious that the opinion of the author may seem controversial and poorly reasoned. Therefore, as information for consideration, we Viagra the mechanism of erection note the following: 1. The science of vitamins, their lack of and need correction breastfeeding occurred many years ago, when no one never heard of adapted infant formula. 2. Remodel existing regulations and to challenge the views of academics from the food - always was not easy. 3. Remember - juices, vegetable purees, fruit porridge - it's not just a lure. This is a very serious business. 4. In poor developing countries where breast-feeding the hungry and (or) monotonously feeds (for example, only rice, or just the dates, or just fish, or bread alone) to give the baby vitamin - completely appropriate. If the salary can be purchased in one egg a week - it is logical to give a four-month crumbs quarters yolk. But if you can buy a dozen eggs - then it is better nursing mom eat eggs of three eyes.
And the last. See the benefits of early weaning is impossible. By and large, the parents just put on his own conscience fat check, they say, we did everything right. But the damage to see thousands - the emergence or strengthening of diathesis, disorders of the chair. In short, everything in fact - academics write instructions, the industry produces juices, pediatricians recommend juices, juices give moms, kids juice drink, pediatricians treat diarrhea and allergy moms buy medicines and other juices - the main guys, the heart does not get old "...
FOOD HEALTHY CHILDREN
In this section we talk about children emerging from infancy and have reached a "common table" - those who eat all or most of what they eat adults.
Fundamentally important point - the child's diet under no circumstances should not be a meaningful adult life. Wise counsel "not to make the cult of the meal" in relation to children is relevant as ever.
The most "exciting" is the theme of appetite, and the number of related issues directly linked to the prosperity of the family. By and large, the appetite - the desire for food intake - is the equivalent of energy expended by the child. At that spends energy baby? The growth and development, on locomotor activity, and for maintaining body temperature. How many can spend energy smart, well read and always warmly dressed child, who, instead of active play in the fresh air, learning a language? Rhetorical question, but here are obvious answer is not conducive for some reason, the adoption of adequate solutions. Quite often the lack of appetite in a child - a sign of laziness or employment of the parents. In any case, mobilizing the entire family, and with songs, dances, cajoling and promises of gifts to feed the wretched starving child is much easier and simpler than spend half a day outdoors.
In general, the presence of appetite - the certificate of readiness of the body to ensure that the adopted properly digest food, and hence food against the will - do not make much sense.
We now consider the issues raised most often.
*
Feeding on the clock. The basis of the recommendations - the teachings of the famous physiologist Pavlov. If you eat at the same time, by this time begin to produce gastric and intestinal juices, and it is very useful because it improves the digestive process. Not taken into account, however, the fact that a person is not always possible to have one and the same time. Pavlov conducted experiments on dogs, but a way of life of the dog is slightly different from the lifestyles of our children. Pavlov did not put on the dog socks and hats, his animals are not nervous in connection with the obtained two and have not been able to watch TV. In short, the normal modern child affected by many factors, each of which can affect appetite. It seems that the conclusion is unequivocal - no feeding on the clock and on appetite, but it's not as easy as it might seem at first glance.
Not easy, primarily because the child uttered the phrase "I want to eat" in the thousands of families clearly perceived as a call for immediate action - a hungry child! However, feeding on the appetite does not turn parents and grandparents in any other victims. The problems here are more educational than medical. If the child refused to eat, what foods he should not get then, whenever he wants, but when my mother will be time for a feeding. And there's nothing wrong with that child can wait. Came home from school and have refused, and an hour later wanted to - well, wait another hour or until dad comes from work. In short, the problem of feeding at a certain time does not exist. There are only two fundamentally important factor - 1. Appetite and 2. Availability of ready meals. And if the food is, and no appetite, you should not force the child. The main time to explain to him that the presence of appetite is not the reason to adults, forgetting about all the affairs, rushed into the kitchen. By the way, the coincidence of paragraphs 1 and 2 can be considered as the main criterion for the absence of family problems with nutrition.
*
It's like, do not want it. Identified problems with 99% of the cases has its foundation pedagogy. A hungry man eats what is given. Yes, for most people, fried potatoes better than barley porridge. But when an early age parents respond positively to children's demands - a situation very quickly comes to a standstill. If by yelling and screaming child can not get that offer, and what you want is him - it is not a medical problem. Love of children should in no way contribute to a sense of their own selfishness and exclusiveness. Absolutely unacceptable to this state of affairs when the stupid dad and mom swallow the soup, and a clever Peter eats chicken cutlets. Interestingly, the mother herself, commenting on the situation, said synochku: "Poor is your wife and how she will feed you?". So, maybe there is some logic to not create problems for children in the future?
*
Feeding in the intervals between feedings. Phenomenon is surprisingly common. Apple, nuts, pechenitse etc. With medical products is harmful, though, because saliva - basic converter germs entering the mouth. Permanent power will not only compares the child ruminant animals, but also may contribute to diseases such as, for example, chronic tonsillitis. This, incidentally, is not talking about chewing gum that the food have nothing to do. Thus, feeding during the intervals between feedings is not valid in two cases: 1. Problems with appetite and 2. The presence of chronic infections in the oropharynx.
*
Sweetness. Source of pleasure, first, and a source of readily available energy, and secondly.
Very difficult to be adviser in matters of marriage - the personal human experience is usually limited to one or two attempts. A little easier to solve sexual problems - that of a normal adult a little more experience - at least once in 10 days everyone is trying their knowledge in this matter, if not expanded, then at least make sure that there is life in the old dog yet ... But if we are talking about food - there can be three times each day holds over his body experiments. And because the experience is large, as they do not share - that spawn numerous treatises on the rules of supply, the compatibility of products, how to give the enemies of dinner, the benefits of raw food diet, the saving of fasting and so on and so n.
Numerous "theory of food - vegetarian, separate food and others - surprisingly reminiscent of religious tracts, in which angels, saints and sinners are replaced by proteins, fats, carbohydrates, slag and calories.
"He who believes in Mohammed, who is in God, who Jesus ..." and who in the enzyme, intestinal juice and the aforementioned proteins and carbohydrates - there's nothing you can do. Man - a being suggestible, and if you really convince myself that I must just so - it will always live and be happier.
It is crucial, however, another - any adult uncle and aunt are entitled to, based on their personal views and material resources, to solve - what, whom, when, together with what, instead of what and how much should be eaten. But the children! How to deal with them? The child's not to blame for the fact that his father decided to leisure master the rules of "nutrition", he (the child) can not feed itself - could chew and swallow, but to produce products in any way.
Hence an important conclusion - any experiments with food should brand name viagra be carried out on himself. Use their own children as guinea pigs - a cruel and unethical.
But those who support the Truth? Who knows - when, what, in what quantities? Probably no one. Nobody could be uniquely convinced he is right, but there is a definite reason to try to introduce some of the frames, narrow the range of the experiments, if not to teach the "correct", then tell - which certainly do not.
It is reasonable to try to find some criteria to answer questions about good and bad. Therefore, take some of the arguments. Thus, a man as a species there thousands of years. Over the millennia, he not only survived but became the "king of nature" - probably because it followed the laws of Nature. It is logical to assume the following: - if the power of the human species is accompanied by certain problems, these problems are natural for humans, and therefore there are natural mechanisms to solve these problems. We illustrate this situation with two simple examples.
1.
Have people go hungry? Of course, yes, for that matter, or any other biological species (hares, wolves, Carp, deer) from those that exist in the wild today. Output - fasting for a person naturally. You can talk about a sense of proportion, we can justify the rationality of the arguments about fasting get rid of toxins, but clearly there is a natural appropriateness.
2.
Vegetarianism. Ate or did not eat fish and meat our ancestors? From the standpoint of the author, is even eaten. And some people do not eat anything except fish and meat - for example, the Eskimos. Conclusion - vegetarianism, may be good, but from the perspective of Nature, it is not natural.
Becomes clear that if, for some reason a child will be left without food, the natural (evolutionary, physiological) mechanisms for adaptation will not give him an abyss. But the absence in the diet of animal protein will inevitably lead to impaired growth and development, as the above-mentioned mechanisms of adaptation to supply such an option does not exist.
Getting finally to the specific recommendations, we emphasize that in the vast subject should, firstly, divided into 3 main areas:
a) feeding young children;
b) nutrition and healthy children
a) The relationship nutrition and disease.
Secondly, we note that our task is not to provide answers to personal, tactical issues - how to cook oatmeal and how to feed a child sick with viral hepatitis. Our goal - a common strategy - the formulation of principles - which is not that good, bad, and that does not matter.
MEALS EARLY CHILDHOOD
The child should eat those foods that are most natural for him at the appropriate age.
And certainly no need to prove to anyone that there can be for a newborn child is nothing more valuable (natural) than breast milk. Not surprisingly, the infant-feeding mothers' milk and is called - naturally.
We note some fundamental aspects.
*
Time of the first latch to the breast. The first drops of milk - Colostrum - contain a substance, "triggering" the development of the immune system and normal digestion. Therefore, the sooner the child is applied to the chest, the better (best - right in rodzale). This fact is clearly proved by physiologists and physicians. Nevertheless, hundreds of maternity homes bring children to the first feeding on the second or third day, and even later. Motivated by a mother's fatigue, weakness of the child, the possibility of some congenital diseases in which the attachment to the breast can be dangerous and to refine the diagnosis takes time. In fact, the real reasons to not feed immediately after birth occur very rarely. Ways of solving problems - confidential conversation expectant parents with the doctor making the decision about the time of first feeding - a pediatric hospital (neonatologist). Always remember that do not feed immediately - a decision less risky and less responsible, and pay the doctor-neonatologist in no way encourage him to make responsible decisions.
*
If no or not enough milk? According to modern views that are optimally adapted to the use of infant formula. Choosing the latter is huge, and the dignity of obvious - ease of preparation, the presence of adequate amounts of vitamins, mineral salts and trace elements. Any dilution of cow's milk and is clearly inferior in all respects ready mixes. The only argument in favor - the price, although afterwards on medicines likely will take more money, so the savings is questionable.
*
The frequency of feedings and night break. A growing number of pediatricians has come finally to the conclusion that the most natural method of free-feeding. The essence of the latter - the child eats when hungry. From the physiological position, absolutely unnatural to wake the child to feed, and not to feed the hungry and screaming just because time has not come. The existence of biorhythms completely proved and from this point of view is obvious: the need for food can vary considerably not only in relation to time of day, but depending on weather conditions, time of day, the quality of breast milk and many other factors. Recommendations on the need to break in the night feeding - the best way to cause neurological disorders in parents and neighbors.
*
Lure - what and when? Interesting word "lure" requires explanation. Lure called the foods that the child receives the first year of life, in addition to breast milk or formula milk (not to be confused with the "supplementation"; supplementation - is when, for example, lacking a mother and baby finish feeding milk baby formula). The need for supplementary feeding is due to the assurances of scientists that at a certain stage of development of baby vitamins and other nutrients in breast milk does not provide the child's needs. Hence the conclusion - already a month old should give apple juice, and from 4 months - vegetable broth (or at least, that such instructions are in the medical "Handbook of Pediatric Dietetics). Studying these instructions, the author constantly feels the deepest doubts. Is unclear how contrive to date there other mammals? No, you can certainly assume that the mother-wolf consumes some unknown herb, to help the cubs back on its feet (or more precisely, on foot). Having read science fiction, you can even imagine how two-week cub daddy wolf-hunting brings valuable vitaminosoderzhaschie vegetables. But even with a maximum voltage of mental activity can not understand - where the "lack" vitamins white bear? What a clever way Nature punishes human children, where this inferiority complex? Why do all the other animals can live without the vegetable soups, and our children can not? But to admit that he was mistaken Creator (God or evolution, does not matter), the author can not.
The conclusion suggests itself - if the child does not have enough vitamins, you should either be properly fed by his mother, or give the baby milk formula, in that clever uncle and aunt have already included all the necessary vitamins. No one can ever really explain why a glass of apple juice, drunk nursing mother is worse than the drop of the same juice, swallowed month old baby.
But someday have to give something else. And when? To search for an answer once again sought the advice of Nature. In isolation from civilization baby is fed breast milk until the time when you can eat what his dad would bring from the hunt. And for eating will require teeth. Thus, the appearance of teeth is an important biological criterion, indicating the need for complementary feeding. And it becomes clear that all children are different - one lure will be needed in 6 months, and another - only 8. But no less clear something else: statements like "all of the month and all the juice from 5 months of soup" - at least, controversial.
Using a five-month age of fermented milk products, cheese, dairy, cereals (semolina, oats, rice, buckwheat) - is justified, but juices, broths, soups, egg yolks, vegetable and fruit puree to give the appearance of the teeth should not be.
It is obvious that the opinion of the author may seem controversial and poorly reasoned. Therefore, as information for consideration, we Viagra the mechanism of erection note the following: 1. The science of vitamins, their lack of and need correction breastfeeding occurred many years ago, when no one never heard of adapted infant formula. 2. Remodel existing regulations and to challenge the views of academics from the food - always was not easy. 3. Remember - juices, vegetable purees, fruit porridge - it's not just a lure. This is a very serious business. 4. In poor developing countries where breast-feeding the hungry and (or) monotonously feeds (for example, only rice, or just the dates, or just fish, or bread alone) to give the baby vitamin - completely appropriate. If the salary can be purchased in one egg a week - it is logical to give a four-month crumbs quarters yolk. But if you can buy a dozen eggs - then it is better nursing mom eat eggs of three eyes.
And the last. See the benefits of early weaning is impossible. By and large, the parents just put on his own conscience fat check, they say, we did everything right. But the damage to see thousands - the emergence or strengthening of diathesis, disorders of the chair. In short, everything in fact - academics write instructions, the industry produces juices, pediatricians recommend juices, juices give moms, kids juice drink, pediatricians treat diarrhea and allergy moms buy medicines and other juices - the main guys, the heart does not get old "...
FOOD HEALTHY CHILDREN
In this section we talk about children emerging from infancy and have reached a "common table" - those who eat all or most of what they eat adults.
Fundamentally important point - the child's diet under no circumstances should not be a meaningful adult life. Wise counsel "not to make the cult of the meal" in relation to children is relevant as ever.
The most "exciting" is the theme of appetite, and the number of related issues directly linked to the prosperity of the family. By and large, the appetite - the desire for food intake - is the equivalent of energy expended by the child. At that spends energy baby? The growth and development, on locomotor activity, and for maintaining body temperature. How many can spend energy smart, well read and always warmly dressed child, who, instead of active play in the fresh air, learning a language? Rhetorical question, but here are obvious answer is not conducive for some reason, the adoption of adequate solutions. Quite often the lack of appetite in a child - a sign of laziness or employment of the parents. In any case, mobilizing the entire family, and with songs, dances, cajoling and promises of gifts to feed the wretched starving child is much easier and simpler than spend half a day outdoors.
In general, the presence of appetite - the certificate of readiness of the body to ensure that the adopted properly digest food, and hence food against the will - do not make much sense.
We now consider the issues raised most often.
*
Feeding on the clock. The basis of the recommendations - the teachings of the famous physiologist Pavlov. If you eat at the same time, by this time begin to produce gastric and intestinal juices, and it is very useful because it improves the digestive process. Not taken into account, however, the fact that a person is not always possible to have one and the same time. Pavlov conducted experiments on dogs, but a way of life of the dog is slightly different from the lifestyles of our children. Pavlov did not put on the dog socks and hats, his animals are not nervous in connection with the obtained two and have not been able to watch TV. In short, the normal modern child affected by many factors, each of which can affect appetite. It seems that the conclusion is unequivocal - no feeding on the clock and on appetite, but it's not as easy as it might seem at first glance.
Not easy, primarily because the child uttered the phrase "I want to eat" in the thousands of families clearly perceived as a call for immediate action - a hungry child! However, feeding on the appetite does not turn parents and grandparents in any other victims. The problems here are more educational than medical. If the child refused to eat, what foods he should not get then, whenever he wants, but when my mother will be time for a feeding. And there's nothing wrong with that child can wait. Came home from school and have refused, and an hour later wanted to - well, wait another hour or until dad comes from work. In short, the problem of feeding at a certain time does not exist. There are only two fundamentally important factor - 1. Appetite and 2. Availability of ready meals. And if the food is, and no appetite, you should not force the child. The main time to explain to him that the presence of appetite is not the reason to adults, forgetting about all the affairs, rushed into the kitchen. By the way, the coincidence of paragraphs 1 and 2 can be considered as the main criterion for the absence of family problems with nutrition.
*
It's like, do not want it. Identified problems with 99% of the cases has its foundation pedagogy. A hungry man eats what is given. Yes, for most people, fried potatoes better than barley porridge. But when an early age parents respond positively to children's demands - a situation very quickly comes to a standstill. If by yelling and screaming child can not get that offer, and what you want is him - it is not a medical problem. Love of children should in no way contribute to a sense of their own selfishness and exclusiveness. Absolutely unacceptable to this state of affairs when the stupid dad and mom swallow the soup, and a clever Peter eats chicken cutlets. Interestingly, the mother herself, commenting on the situation, said synochku: "Poor is your wife and how she will feed you?". So, maybe there is some logic to not create problems for children in the future?
*
Feeding in the intervals between feedings. Phenomenon is surprisingly common. Apple, nuts, pechenitse etc. With medical products is harmful, though, because saliva - basic converter germs entering the mouth. Permanent power will not only compares the child ruminant animals, but also may contribute to diseases such as, for example, chronic tonsillitis. This, incidentally, is not talking about chewing gum that the food have nothing to do. Thus, feeding during the intervals between feedings is not valid in two cases: 1. Problems with appetite and 2. The presence of chronic infections in the oropharynx.
*
Sweetness. Source of pleasure, first, and a source of readily available energy, and secondly.
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)